All posts by A Futurist at the Movies

A Futurist at the Movies is written by Josh Calder, a futurist living in Washington, DC. For more about Josh, see "Who am I?" or contact him here.

Match the GOP Candidate with the Futurist Movie

Which futurist movie results if each GOP candidate is elected?


Newt Gingrich:

  • “The Road” — Bold new thinking, like removing government regulations against eating children.
  • Alternate scenario: “Zardoz” — Giant heads drifting around making strange pronouncements.

Mitt Romney:

  • “Demolition Man” — The moralizing is half-assed, but at least corporations are doing well.
  • Alternate scenario: “AI: Artificial Intelligence” — So much effort to build the perfect human, but it is never quite convincing.

Ron Paul:

  • “Mad Max” — Government is finally off our backs (and market forces are allowed to play out in the energy industry).

Rick Perry:

  • “Rollerball” — Corporations rule the planet, and Houston is recognized as a global power center.

Rick Santorum:

  • “The Handmaid’s Tale” — Order is restored to familial relations.
  • Alternate scenario: “28 Days Later” — It turns out all that rage can be spread by bodily fluids.

Michele Bachmann:

  • “The Stepford Wives” — Something is deeply wrong in suburbia.

Jon Huntsman:

  • “Silent Running” — Yeah, I don’t know what to say either.

(Thanks to JP and CK for ideas.)


Building an Iron Man Battle Suit

Io9 has tallied how close we are to the capabilities of the battle suit in “Iron Man,” and how much it would cost to replicate (sort of) such a suit.  Their breakdown:

  • Exoskeleton —  $10 million
  • Head-up display — $54 million
  • Portable power source — $36 million
  • Jet packs — $400,000
  • Wearable computers — $20,000
  • TOTAL: $100 million

They correctly note that this is roughly the cost of an F35 fighter plane.  Given that such a suit has capabilities much greater than such a fighter plane, why aren’t we making them?  Because we can’t.

  • Power: We don’t have anything that can generate anything like the output of Iron Man’s power pack, so the suit would be far weaker than the movie version.
  • Flight: Because of the power problem, a flying suit could not fly long or far.
  • Armor: Today’s exoskeletons are not armored.  Even if we could build a powerful suit, it could not stand up against even small-arms fire, much less cannons and missiles.  And the more we armor present-day exoskeletons, the slower and clumsier they’d be.

On the positive side, we could build a highly capable head-up display for a fraction of $54 million, so the wearer would be able to see which insurgent with a $200 AK-47 knockoff was going to take him down.


The power and armor problems are not insurmountable, but a battle suit that is fast, agile, powerful, and armored still seems to be decades away.


(Image courtesy BobbyProm, Flickr)

Hawking Warns of Alien Danger

Physicist Stephen Hawking has created a stir by warning that aliens could endanger humanity, and that we should refrain from drawing attention to ourselves.


“If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn’t turn out well for the Native Americans,” he suggested on his Discovery Channel series.  “We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet,”  the BBC quotes him as saying.  And: “I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they can reach.”


While this is a possible outcome, that it “would” come out this way presupposes a lot about the nature of aliens.


As I’ve noted, aliens will be alien.  They might be benevolent, hostile, or indifferent, and they might have purposes and emotions incomprehensible to us.  (We tend to define emotion and intellect by our own mind’s range, but that is as silly as defining sight by our own limited sensing capabilities on the electromagnetic spectrum.)  Neither conquest nor excessive resource use are inherent in an intelligent species, but are instead products of our distinct evolutionary heritage.


Aliens will also be quite advanced, if they can show up here — we are rapidly developing the technology necessary to detect ourselves at a distance — so it is not clear that we can make ourselves much less conspicuous.


Writing for a Wall Street Journal blog, professor Paul Davies has his own reasons for doubt:

  • The galaxy is vast, and interstellar travel may be unlikely.
  • If aliens needed resources, some ancient species would have shown up long ago in Earth’s history.
  • An advanced species would be unlikely to be aggressive by nature, or would have engineered the tendency out of themselves by now.  “Any truly bellicose alien species would either have wiped itself out long ago, or already taken over the galaxy.”

Let’s hope Davies is right, and we end up more with Close Encounters than Independence Day.

Image copyright Futuristmovies.com — usable with link and attribution

Slow Tuesday Night

R.A. Lafferty published the short story “Slow Tuesday Night” in 1965.  I first read it in the 1970s, and it came back to me as the Internet era unfolded, as it depicts a speeded-up world in which memes come and go in the space of an evening, and someone can conceive a product and make a fortune from it in an evening.  “Things that had once taken months and years now took only minutes and hours.”


I was reminded again of Lafferty yesterday.  Vice President Biden — reinforcing his role as our wacky uncle — said to Obama “This is a big f***ing deal!” near a microphone, on live TV.  It was of course picked up by Tweeters and bloggers instantly.


Within a couple of hours, one could already buy apparel, mugs, and many other products with the new catchphrase on sites like Zazzle.  Lafferty might be pleased.


(Image courtesy Whitehouse.gov)

Follow on Twitter: @Geofutures

How Realistic Is “The Crazies”?

Popular Mechanics evaluated the science of The Crazies yesterday.


As PM describes it, “a genetically engineered toxin created by the military escapes into the water supply of idyllic Ogden Marsh, Iowa, transforming the town’s residents into a bloody, infected horde.”  In other words, it is a zombie movie.


The premise is not implausible: the filmmakers consulted the CDC and based the disease on tetanus, rabies, and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.  With enough work, one probably could engineer a toxin that would short out behavioral control and induce rage.


As the virus spreads, the government takes drastic, Outbreak-style quarantine measures, sealing the town off.  While it would take a highly threatening disease to trigger this kind of action,  it is imaginable.  Quarantines have a legal basis, and a horrific, contagious disease might trigger a radical approach.


(Image copyright Futuristmovies.com — usable with link and permission)

Follow on Twitter: @Geofutures